Posts

Medical Billing Book Review: If Disney Ran Your Hospital: 9 1/2 Things You Would Do Differently

Fred Lee, the author of If Disney Ran Your Hospital: 9.5 Things you would do differently, has great story-telling talent and a unique combination of first-hand experience working at hospitals and Disney. This book compares the workflows and cultures at both and teaches us how to design modern hospital patient interactions for success. It turns out that his lessons are directly applicable to my physical therapy billing software business.

Whenever a medical billing service owner comes to me for “billing software” they usually mean software to manage what they had. I, on the other had, want to understand how their service is designed and delivered and what the practice owner (their customer) and the patient (their customer’s customer) would expect. It seems to me that if the billing service is sub-par, outdated, or not profitable, we should consider redesigning it before automating it. I believe that the worst you can do to a poorly delivered service is to scale it up and exacerbate an already negative customer experience by delivering it faster to more customers. This often does not sit well with billing service owners who see my expertise limited to selling my software and see my questions about their business approach and growth, compliance, and convenience as needlessly intrusive.

You would think that a billing service owner has a much more difficult customer than Disney; the risk of client loss is higher; the medical billing environment is much more complex with many more non-standard situations. At Disney, the customers start our happy and excited instead of upset and underpaid. They stand in lines but not worried about their insurance claims, patient referrals, or compliance. They take a ride that’s duplicated a million times while every new payer is a unique experience. Meanwhile practice operations, technology, and legal costs are growing. Disney looks like a picnic compared to the nightmare the billing and practice managers face every day in a hostile payer environment over which we have very little of the kind of control we would have at Disney.

This book is practical and profound. Instantly useful.

The Bottom Line of Physical Therapy Billing

PT, physical therapy, software, billing, notesby Nina Silberstein @ Physical Therapy Products, January 2011

Whether you keep it in-house or outsource, navigating billing and reimbursement procedures can be a tricky process

As much as you enjoy treating your patients, billing and claim reimbursement are most likely not on the top of your list of pleasurable tasks. You probably didn’t learn a lot about running a practice and keeping your finances in order in physical therapy school. But understanding the business side of your job is just as important as seeing clients. Here are two questions to consider: Do you assign the billing/reimbursement duties to a member of your office staff, or do you send things out to a medical billing company? We’ll discuss the pros and cons of these decisions as well as effective billing and documentation practices.

STAYING IN-HOUSE

There are advantages and disadvantages to this, but “The answer depends on the volume of the insurance claims,” says Yuval Lirov, PhD, co-founder of Bellmore, NY-based bestPT, which specializes in billing services and practice-management software. “The payers make profit on the float, so they hold onto the money that must be paid to the provider for as long as possible. The payers have developed solid processes, built state-of-the-art technology, and hired Harvard MBAs to accomplish their business goals,” he says.

Lirov believes that if the volume of your insurance claims is small, then you can process your billing in-house. But as soon as you start seeing many insurance patients, your billing process, technology, and follow-up team must be able to match the payors’ process, technology, and personnel. Lirov has five patents in artificial intelligence and computer security, and has authored three books.

For physical therapy practices, his company integrates a single technology infrastructure that includes scheduling, documentation, and electronic billing; a shared billing knowledge base; and disciplined claims processing. It will track payer performance from a single point of control, share payer compliance rules globally, and match its physical therapy and rehabilitation billing rules to the evolving payer’s environment.

If you plan to do your billing yourself, there are many things you’ll either need to know or to have: good licensed billing software; proper billing, diagnosis, and CPT codes; correct insurance terminology; your state’s laws; easy-to-understand patient forms; and knowing when to bill/collect from the patient. There’s much more, according to Lirov. “You need to build a process to discover delays and underpayments, to follow-up on every delay and underpayment until it’s paid in full and on time,” he says.

Then you need to continuously monitor and perfect that process. “Depending on the nature of the claim, the payor, and the quality of your follow-up process, the time frame may vary between 14 days and never,” he says. “You need to measure that delay and act aggressively when it starts growing.”

Consider that when you have high insurance claim volumes, you need a very high degree of process transparency and control to make sure that you submitted a claim for every patient visit, that the claim includes correct patient demographics and charges, that your notes support the charges in case you get audited, and that it was accepted by the insurance company and paid in full and on time.

“There are certain reasons why it becomes more cost-effective to have it internally in your practice or clinic,” adds Lynn Steffes, PT, president/consultant at Steffes & Associates Consulting Group in New Berlin, Wis. “The capabilities of that have increased, there is a move toward electronic medical records, and many of those [systems] also generate bills.” The other element is managing the process on the front end. It becomes so important when patients’ responsibility is growing. “For example,” Steffes says, “Twenty years ago, a patient might have had a $5 co-pay. Now there’s a $50 co-pay, and you’re only collecting $40 from the insurance.”

Because such a high percentage of collections are patient-related, Steffes recommends you have a process for gathering insurance information, verifying benefits and eligibility in a customer-friendly way, and setting up payment expectations. “That’s important,” she says. “Part of taking care of people is the financial equation.”

Steffes’ consulting group offers rehab providers services nationwide to improve reimbursement results and conform to compliance guidelines, including rehab documentation, payer relations and contracting, billing and coding, compliance, rehab agency management, and application of the guide to physical therapy practice. She is also network administrator for a group of more than 50 private-practice clinics and is the Wisconsin Physical Therapy Association Reimbursement Specialist.

Steffes is in and out of about 100 clinics per year and finds that if they aren’t being carefully managed at the front end, they are losing money. Or, patients may come in, get billed on the back end, become upset with their bills, neglect payment, and then resist returning to therapy when they need it because of large outstanding balances.

“Therapists have to understand what the eligibility is; they have to be able to negotiate a plan of care with the patient,” Steffes says. “There are good reasons to bring it in-house—the technology we’re currently using, informed consumers, cash flow, all of that. The flip side, if you do that, you need someone who is skilled and knows to stay up-to-date. A lot of practices hire someone with minimal experience and then provide them with no supportive training. That’s a huge problem.” Steffes thinks where practices tend to stumble is not having the tools and training for doing it right.

In practices of all sizes, often the person responsible for billing and collections also wears one or many other hats within the practice. This person is usually found at the front desk—doing registration, answering patient inquiries, filing, faxing, keeping referrals up-to-date, corresponding with physicians—and that can leave billing to be just one more thing on the plate that needs to get done. Things inevitably fall through the cracks and can’t get done as quickly due to the demands in the office.

SELECTING A BILLING COMPANY

“I think the very top of the list would have to be whether or not the outside source has any experience doing physical therapy billing,” says Dave Stuart, president and COO of Syncopation Revenue Solutions Inc, a full-service medical billing company in New Gloucester, Me. “If so, do they focus exclusively on PT? Do they have dedicated people who do just PT billing? Those would be the most pressing questions.”

Stuart also suggests that your practice consider what the effectiveness of your current system is and what the cost of continuing your in-house process is versus sending the process to an outside company (along with the potential improvement in cash flow). “Sometimes, cash flow may be improved enough to justify any additional cost that an outside agency might involve,” he adds. “Often, outsourcing can help to control costs and provide for peace of mind in not having to deal with the human resources-related issues—ie, sick time, vacation time, corrective action, management of the process, etc.”

In addition, you might also consider if any of the principals of the billing firm have any direct experience in owning/managing a privately owned PT practice. PT billing is different from other specialties and should be handled accordingly.

“If you plan to outsource your billing, you must make sure that the billing company you hire is able to level the playing field with the payors,” Lirov says. “That it has the required level of transparency and control as well as the ability to adjust its processes and technology in step with the changes continuously inflicted by the payors.”

Full article here.